| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Framing Rationale for the Iraq WarThe Interaction of Public Support with Mass Media and Public Policy AgendasUniversity of Texas at Arlington, 700 W. Second, 118 Fine Arts Building, Arlington, TX 760190107, USA, christie{at}uta.edu This study examines the initial US rationale given for the Iraq War using agenda-setting and agenda-building approaches and a model for understanding the interaction of public opinion with public policy and mass media agendas. To study these dynamics, the study examines two distinct periods of time, of high and low public support of the war (AprilMay 2003 and AprilMay 2004). A content analysis of White House briefings, two major national/international newspapers and a major television network's news coverage examines the key rationale for the Iraq War in mass media and policy agendas. Results show a relationship between the White House and media agendas on central issues of the war terrorism, weapons of mass destruction and the assembly of a coalition to prosecute the war during a period of high public support and not during a time of low public support. The model of agendaopinion congruence may be useful in explaining these interactions in times of war or other national crises.
Key Words: agenda-building agenda-setting framing Iraq War mass media public policy
International Communication Gazette, Vol. 68, No. 5-6,
519-532 (2006) |
|||